<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL K. PRINTZ &#187; Lawyer&#8217;s Corner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelegacylawyer.com/category/lawyers-corner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelegacylawyer.com</link>
	<description>Daniel K. Printz is an experienced attorney and teaches &#34;Estates, Wills and Trusts&#34; at the University of San Diego.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California rules in favor of gay-marriage opponents.</title>
		<link>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/11/california-rules-in-favor-of-gay-marriage-opponents/</link>
		<comments>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/11/california-rules-in-favor-of-gay-marriage-opponents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Printz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyer's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-Sex Couples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state officials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelegacylawyer.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the California Supreme Court, acting on a request by the Ninth District Court of Appeals, held that the proponents of a ballot initiative have standing to support the measure in court when State officials decline to do so. The underlying case? A complaint filed in federal court against the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-ft="{&quot;type&quot;:1}">Today the California Supreme Court, acting on a request by the Ninth District Court of Appeals, held that the proponents of a ballot initiative have standing to support the measure in court when State officials decline to do so. The underlying case? A complaint filed in federal court against the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the amendment to the state constitution limiting the right to marry to opposite-sex couples. You can read a synopsis of the ruling <a title="Court Summary" href="http://courts.ca.gov/15943.htm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p data-ft="{&quot;type&quot;:1}">In so doing, the California Supreme Court has carved out an exception to the general rule that State officials have discretion as to whether or not they will defend a law in court. This exception applies only to the initiative process, and holds that the proponents of an initiative have standing to support in court. It has logic: Often a ballot measure is only necessary because state officials are unwilling or unable to create the legislation on their own.</p>
<p data-ft="{&quot;type&quot;:1}">My unanswered question &#8211; does an average citizen unrelated to the drafters of the petition have the same standing? If so you could have 18,000,000 parties in support and another 15,000,000 in opposition. Now that would be a class action!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/11/california-rules-in-favor-of-gay-marriage-opponents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daniel Printz to Speak at Seminar on Estate Administration</title>
		<link>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/09/daniel-printz-to-speak-at-nbi-seminar-december-5-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/09/daniel-printz-to-speak-at-nbi-seminar-december-5-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daniel Printz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paralegals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chfc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuing education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ctec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial planner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iacet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBI seminar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san diego attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelegacylawyer.com/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are looking for continuing education credits in San Diego, attorney Daniel K. Printz will be presenting at a National Business Institute Seminar on December 5, 2011. The seminar will be held from 8:30 am to 4:40 pm at the Doubletree Hotel San Diego Downtown, located at 1646 Front Street, San Diego, CA 92101. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for continuing education credits in San Diego, attorney Daniel K. Printz will be presenting at a National Business Institute Seminar on December 5, 2011. The seminar will be held from 8:30 am to 4:40 pm at the Doubletree Hotel San Diego Downtown, located at 1646 Front Street, San Diego, CA 92101.</p>
<p>The title of the seminar is <strong>Estate Administration Procedures: Why Each Step is Important.</strong> Along with Mr. Printz, faculty will include Janathan Allen of Allen Barron, sole practitioner Stuart Schechter, and Charles T. Scott of Kimball, Tirey &amp; St. John.</p>
<p>The seminar will provide the following credits: California MCLE Paralegal; CFP for Financial Planners - 8.0; CLE for Attorneys- 6.75; CTEC for tax preparers- 8.0; IACET &#8211; 0.7; CPE for accountants/NASBA &#8211; 8.0; and PACE (CLU, CASL, ChFC) &#8211; 8.0</p>
<p>To register, call (800) 930-6182 or go to <a href="http://www.nbi-sems.com/">www.nbi-sems.com</a>.</p>
<p>This is a basic level seminar, and provides fundamental estate administration topics for: attorneys; accountants; paralegals; trust officers; estate planners; and financial planners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/09/daniel-printz-to-speak-at-nbi-seminar-december-5-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for Lawyers Who Tweet</title>
		<link>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/03/tips-for-lawyers-who-tweet/</link>
		<comments>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/03/tips-for-lawyers-who-tweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyer's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[define purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina F. Rubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina Rubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers who tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal intelligencer blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referral sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for lawyers who tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelegacylawyer.com/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I came across a well-written article that deals with these questions, and provides some practical tips for lawyers who tweet. It's by Gina Rubel and was published online in the Legal Intelligencer Blog. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today in &#8220;The Lawyer&#8217;s Corner&#8221; I&#8217;d like to talk about Twitter.  I began using Twitter in earnest last year, then abandoned it, and recently decided to give it another chance.  However, I struggle to define my audience. Am I communicating with potential clients? Referral sources? Other lawyers or my former paralegal students? How much information should I share about my own parenting experiences?</p>
<p>Today I came across a well-written article that deals with these questions, and provides some practical tips for lawyers who tweet. It&#8217;s by Gina Rubel and was published online in the Legal Intelligencer Blog.  Here it is, reproduced in full:</p>
<p>Monday, March 14, 2011</p>
<div>The Benefits of Twitter for Lawyers: A Strategy for Engagement</div>
<div><strong>By <a href="mailto:%20gina@furiarubel.com" target="_blank">Gina Rubel</a></strong><br />
<em>Special to the Legal Intelligencer Blog</em></div>
<p>There are many benefits of lawyers using Twitter. In fact, I know many lawyers who have met both referral sources and new business contacts using Twitter.</p>
<p>As far as having a plan to engage in Twitter communications, I recommend taking the following approach: Define Purpose &gt; Follow &gt; Listen &gt; Create &gt; Engage. Here’s how:</p>
<p>1. Define your purpose in using Twitter. Identify what you want to accomplish by using Twitter as a vehicle for communication.</p>
<p>2. Follow: Identify the target audiences you want to reach: business and community leaders, referral sources, colleagues, experts, media, prospective clients and other thought leaders. Research those within your target audience who are using Twitter. Search for them by name, company name, topic, hashtag, etc. Start by following those people who are thought leaders in your industry.</p>
<p>3. Listen: Pay attention to what others are saying online. Add each person you follow to a defined list. Keep the lists private. For example, you can have lists for colleagues, legal media, experts, etc. Be careful, however, how you name your lists, as nothing is every truly &#8220;private&#8221; online. For example, I don’t recommend naming a list &#8220;clients&#8221; or &#8220;referral sources.&#8221; Consider that T.M.I. (too much information).</p>
<p>4. Create: Create and or share content and information of value, such as breaking news, important news stories, upcoming events, resources, interesting observations, industry trends, articles, blogs posts, valuable website content (articles, practice area information), etc.</p>
<p>5. Engage: Engage in two-way conversation by direct messaging, mentioning others and retweeting information of value to your target audiences.</p>
<p>Twitter is an excellent tool to add to the mix of communication vehicles that you are using to build or reinforce your brand, increase referrals, build community relations, share information and build your network. Other benefits include crisis management, issue advocacy, marketing, public relations, media relations, reputation management and thought leadership. Just be smart about using social media, encourage the implementation of a social media policy in your firm and always be sure to adhere to the rules of ethics proscribed by the states within which you practice law. </p>
<p><em><a href="mailto:%20gina@furiarubel.com" target="_blank">Gina F. Rubel </a>is the owner of Furia Rubel Communications Inc., a public relations and marketing agency with a niche in legal communications. A former Philadelphia trial attorney and public relations expert, Rubel is the author of &#8220;Everyday Public Relations for Lawyers.&#8221; Rubel and her agency have won numerous awards for legal communications, public relations, media relations, strategic planning, corporate philanthropy and leadership. She maintains a blog at <a href="www.ThePRLawyer.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">www.ThePRLawyer.com</a> and is a regular contributor to The Legal Intelligencer blog. You can find her on LinkedIn at <a href="http://thelegalintelligencer.typepad.com/tli/2011/03/www.linkedin.com/in/ginafuriarubel" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com/in/ginafuriarubel</a> or follow her on Twitter at <a href="http://twitter.com/ginarubel" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/ginarubel</a>.  For more information, go to <a href="www.furiarubel.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">www.FuriaRubel.com</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/03/tips-for-lawyers-who-tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Can I Get a Copy of My Trust?</title>
		<link>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/03/how-can-i-get-a-copy-of-my-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/03/how-can-i-get-a-copy-of-my-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Printz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assumed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[father]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how can i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inheritance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knight v knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trustee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states trust law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelegacylawyer.com/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your father, as a settlor and trustee, has a right to a copy of the trust that he and your mother hired the attorney to draft, assuming the attorney still retains a copy in the file. The request does not have to be notarized; in fact, he should simply be able to pick up the phone and call.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How can I get a copy of my trust from the trustee?&#8221;</p>
<p>I was recently asked the following question on the legal answer website <a title="Daniel Printz at AVVO" href="http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/92014-ca-daniel-printz-264292.html" target="_blank">AVVO.COM</a>.  My answer was chosen as &#8220;best answer&#8221; by the questioner.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Question</span>: My father wants a copy of my parent&#8217;s trust. He wants to request this in writing as it is difficult for him to get around. My mother claims she has misplaced the trust. My father would like to get a copy of the trust for me, but he is partially paralyzed and we had to hire full time help to assist him with his daily activities.</p>
<p>The trust attorney told me I would have to write a letter requesting it with the signatures of both of my parents. My father would do this, but my mother refuses. Is there any other way to get a copy of this trust? My mother constantly threatens me, telling me she is going to change the trust.  If my dad is a Trustee, can the Trust attorney legally refuse to do so? Would my dad&#8217;s request have to be notarized?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Answer (after another attorney had stated that the questioner&#8217;s mother would have to approve):</span> I disagree. Your father, as a settlor and trustee, has a right to a copy of the trust that he and your mother hired the attorney to draft, assuming the attorney still retains a copy in the file. The request does not have to be notarized; in fact, he should simply be able to pick up the phone and call. If the attorney is skeptical about your father&#8217;s identity, then he should go to the office himself to pick it up, even if it is difficult to get around.</p>
<p>However, if I were you I&#8217;d talk to an estate planning attorney about this, and the underlying family issues that seem to be present. Where is the original? Was it destroyed? Lost? Is there in fact any property still in the trust? Is there a pending divorce?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>If you want to pose legal questions anonymously and have them answered by a handful of attorneys practicing in the field, consider coming to AVVO.com.  Or, just call me directly at (858) 740-4370, and I&#8217;ll answer your question myself or find someone who can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2011/03/how-can-i-get-a-copy-of-my-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule 9.7</title>
		<link>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2009/04/rule-97/</link>
		<comments>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2009/04/rule-97/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyer's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my state bar profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule 9.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state bar website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelegacylawyer.wordpress.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court has approved Rule 9.7.   This Rule requires attorneys to report their current office address, telephone number, and e-mail address by using their on-line membership account at the State Bar&#8217;s Website.  Members who do not have on-line access (and who might that be?) or who do not have an e-mail address can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Supreme Court has approved Rule 9.7.   This Rule requires attorneys to report their current office address, telephone number, and e-mail address by using their on-line membership account at the <a title="State Bar Website" href="http://www.calbar.org" target="_blank">State Bar&#8217;s Website</a>.  Members who do not have on-line access (<em>and who might that be?</em>) or who do not have an e-mail address can claim an exemption.</p>
<p>To update your information, visit the My State Bar Profile section of the State Bar Website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelegacylawyer.com/2009/04/rule-97/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

